Amendment 4 Florida

Amendment 4 Florida, Florida voters must say “no” on three constitutional amendments on today’s vote that could harm taxpayers, undermine the state’s economy and hurt the democratic values.

Amendment 4 would require voter approval of all changes to local plans for land use. Opponents say it will cost jobs and hurt Florida’s economy by stifling growth, costing millions of taxpayer dollars.

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush said in a recent editorial that the amendment “has the potential to completely stall our economy, making it harder to create jobs, develop, and responsibly manage growth in our country.”

A Florida town that has enacted a similar law found caused years of costly litigation, the burden of taxpayers and led to jobs elsewhere.

Supporters of the amendment say voters deserve a seat at the table “on the growth decisions in their cities and counties. But voters are already in control of comprehensive plans by electing town officials and county that best represent their views on development.

It is crucial for the future of Florida that this amendment is to defeat.

Amendments 5 and 6 should allow Florida courts to draw redistricting maps. They require that district plans can be drawn to favor or oppose a political party or historical. They would also mandate that districts be contiguous, compact, and – if possible – use the existing city, county and geographical boundaries.

Amendment 5 refers to legislative redistricting, Amendment 6, congressional redistricting.

It is clear that the plans would be difficult or impossible to implement, and lead to endless litigation. They increase the likelihood that any redistricting plan to the state legislature would develop the subject of protracted litigation and ultimately be replaced by a system created by judges rather than elected representatives.

As Jeb Bush noted, the amendments could jeopardize the progress of Florida has done this by creating opportunities for all individuals to serve in their government.

Supporters say the amendments curb gerrymandering. But real communities of interest are not necessarily compact and do not fall easily along the lines of political boundaries such as counties. Districts Force adjustment in these lines, it is difficult for the voters of the group on the basis of genuine mutual interest.

Opponents also say it is an act of rescue Trial lawyers, judges and unaccountable would steer the power of the political left.

Voters should say “no” on amendments 4, 5 and 6.

Us Constitution

Us Constitution, The 2010 Constitution Day is the celebration of the event which is the very basis of social organization and U.S. policy. Across the country on Friday, institutions of education of universities applied to smaller schoolhouses in a room is celebrated Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, presenting educational programs on the U.S. Constitution the 223rd anniversary of its signing.

The day was chosen September 17 as the day it was in 1787 when the 12 assignments of State approved the Constitution. Of the 42 delegates present, 39 to sign and officially suspended the constitutional convention. Today is the anniversary of the signing of the Constitution.

Constitution Day, also known as Citizenship Day, commemorates the anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution. September 17, 1787 the U.S. Constitution was signed by U.S. Constitutional Convention. On this day, the Constitution was accepted by members of the Constitutional Convention. This day has to pay tribute.

The National Archives of organizing a holiday and offers 1 223 curious visitors a piece of cake. There are also quizzes and different responses that occur in schools and universities, lesson plans that focus on this event and try to clarify what children better. make posters, plays, staged readings, are just some of the activities marking the celebration.

Constitution Day is a celebration of life, freedom and unity. Focuses on nationalism and freedom and give people the opportunity to better understand the early history of the U.S.. This day has special meaning to people in Delaware, as it was the first state to support and adopt the Constitution. Despite the state in which they live, Americans across the country celebrate Constitution Day with enthusiasm and pride.

19th Amendment Upddate’s

19th Amendment, Ninety years after the 19th Amendment enshrined a woman’s right to political participation in the U.S. Constitution, women may have one of their most influential in U.S. politics, however, analysts say.

The first 50 years of U.S. women’s suffrage was “votes without leverage,” a book of the same name Anna Harvey, a political scientist at the University of New York. But women’s influence in politics is now stronger than ever, and seems to be growing with each successive election cycle.

At least 13 women, a record will win a major party nomination for U.S. Senate this year, assuming three female owners – Lisa Murkowski (R) Alaska, Kirsten Gillibrand (D) of New York and Barbara Mikulski (D) of Maryland – pass a primary token opposition next month.

In the non-elected side of things, there are three judges in the Supreme Court, as Elena Kagan took the oath of Representatives Nancy Pelosi is the first woman to head the House of Representatives. And Secretary of State of the United States has been a woman of 10 of the last 14 years, with Madeleine Albright, Condoleezza Rice, and Hillary Rodham Clinton all serving as diplomat in chief of the country.

The changes reflect the changes in the electorate. More women than men have voted in every presidential election since 1960. Four times since 1976, over 60 percent of women voted in a presidential election, the men have reached the figure of 60 per cent stake only once during that period, according to the Center of Rutgers University for American Women and Politics.

However, despite progress, the gap remains between the participation of women in mass politics and participation of women in the highest levels of the political game, says Jennifer Lawless, a political scientist at American University.

“Women to the polls in larger numbers than men, that women can often be the decisive bloc in an election,” said Ms. Lawless. “Still, women do not see elections as much as men.”

However, in their collective effect on mass politics, political influence of women is high. Women’s groups are increasingly seen as the key to electoral victory for both sides.

In the 1990s, the block was decisive “moms”, the growing class suburban mothers whose primary concerns are education and the economy. After 9 / 11 attacks, “security moms” concerned about t*rror*sm were courted by both parties and accredited for the supply of the victory of George W. Bush ‘s in 2004, which found a greater percentage of votes from women than any other Republican presidential candidate since his father.

No law says that both parties, and especially Democrats, are now recognizing they need a strong supporter of women to win elections. This evident in the way of presenting the platforms to the public. “Women’s issues” are not the focus, but the way you see women’s issues.

“Both sides today really try to frame the issues in terms of the [women],” says Lawless. “Security is framed as, ‘How to keep children safe?” The economy is framed as, ‘How I can put food on the table? “How I can pay for college?”