Sinead O’connor Update

August 10, 2011 by Post Team 

Sinead O'connor UpdateSinead O’connor Update, In 1990, Sinead O’Connor cover almost forgotten one Prince, “Nothing Compares 2U”, broke into the global consciousness of music as a firework explosion. The combination of voices rising to the crash of the shaven head, which only served to make her most poignant expressive eyes, O’Connor’s performance was fascinating.

Fame follows – and then exploded – in the midst of a series of unpopular political views and religious singer, including an attack on the Roman Catholic Church cover-up of sexual abuse of children.

Despite the fall from grace of the singer remained fascinating, combining fragile gamine with an appetite for hard policy. Its tight haircut, consciously anti-female Doc Marten boots, sweaters and coats widths old kept her eyes off the mark. And anything that could or may not lead to hide the enormous power of her vocal talent and lyrical.

Earlier this week, more than two decades after its debut surprisingly, images of a very different looking O’Connor appeared on the Internet after a performance at the Music Festival in Bray on the west coast of Ireland. Showing a Frumpies, bespectacled O’Connor under a mop of black hair and black suit that would have been monastic, but the exposure of a segment of the generous plump belly, the singer’s appearance has caused quite a stir – even in our own website.

Newspapers, online blogs and social sphere of the media on Facebook and Twitter have exploded with astonishment and dismay by the transformation of O’Connor.

“The man, 44 years old singer was unrecognizable from its peak musical as she took the stage wearing a very unflattering combination of a top of the stomach, exposing the black network, and an ill-fitting black pants suit “said the Daily Mail

As if that were not damning enough, the singer self-absorbed air seems to have irritated the role further: “With her black hair in a crop full of difficulties and with glasses and a gold crucifix necklace, Sinead seemed to be a world of their own co-starred with [reggae singer Natty] Wailer. ”

Closer to home, Us Weekly wrote that the singer had surprised her fans with a look that was “totally unrecognizable,” while ABC News put the “before slim” singer in a gallery of stars like Kirstie Alley and Jennifer Hudson who have had problems with her yo-yo-ing weight. “Nothing compares to what … Connor Sinead O ‘seems now,” subtitled it.

Wait. If a singer who uses the window of fame to highlight bewildering political views, as well as bringing personal eerily songs like “Troy” and “Three Babies” in the musical canon really be judged by the same rules that are hard currency common for actresses and reality TV stars?

Sinead O’Connor is not Kim Kardashian, in which each eyebrow wax and start the front is the subject of a celebrity interview or approval of the product. Neither are Natalie Portman and Renee Zellweger, whose transformation of body shape is part of her artistic range.

Instead, the Dublin-born singer, who has four children and the heights of fame, has always given back to the conventions of beauty that are apparently the means to acceptance. The thorny displeasure manifests yet feminine style seems remarkably unchanged prototype of the attitudes he had in her youth.

“What the voices expressing surprise at her new look really surprised by is that Sinead O’Connor should care so little for the opinions of many in the entertainment industry are judged harshly.”
For the indignation that followed the appearance of the singer in Bray, you could be forgiven for thinking that O’Connor has spent the last decade and a half under a rock, all the better to surprise her fans when he reappeared several kilos heavier and without a bald head. In fact, she has enjoyed a musical career that has continued, a bit below the radar, and the singer has released a new album every two years since 2000, as well as touring recently in Moscow and the United Kingdom.

What voices expressing surprise at her new look really surprised by is that Sinead O’Connor should care so little for the opinions of many in the entertainment industry are judged harshly. The wonder of your weight gain is both in their neglect of what others think of it, as a singer is to succumb to the aging process more than 20 years. In fact, it is not exaggerating suggesting that her critics are really uncomfortable with her refusal to hide away permanently, now that the years that thinness was the gamine look is marked in the past.

Its just weeks from the music industry deified Amy Winehouse, a singer with addiction problems that stalled during the tabloid reader’s also cruelly foreshortened talented jazz diva’s life.

As O’Connor, Winehouse’s talent was the kind of once in a generation, a degree of difference in distance of the total height to reach the likes of Adele, another British talent that despite her record of sales success falls into a more conventional mold. Although Winehouse romance and addiction no harmful exists in the hard look of the front pages of newspapers, its slim skinny, hyper-sexualized costumes suspiciously division improved, though less fell into the right side of the aesthetic is prepared the entertainment industry to accept.

Unlike Winehouse, Connor has gotten through life, having a family and keep doing what their fans want to do: perform and record music. In the way of her admission of having different child abuse, bipolar disorder and as a lsbn coming out suggests that the journey has not been without its demons.

But far from criticizing the singer for her audacity to continue performing even when not adjusted to the nostalgic memory of the past two decades, O’Connor congratulated himself on her ability to move forward. Twenty years later, the lyrics of songs like “I feel so different,” “I do not want what I have not” and “Three Babies” have become even more poignant than they were the first time.

Report to Team

Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.


Comments are closed.