Ridley Scott: Prometheus Not Like Alien
April 16, 2012 by staff
Ridley Scott: Prometheus Not Like Alien, I’ve been jetting about recently. As a result, this place has been a bit less busy than usual. Tuesday saw Screenwriter touching down in London for a special screening of new footage from Ridley Scott’s Prometheus. Might Shelley have been speaking of Scott when he wrote “Monarch of Gods and D?mons, and all Spirits/ But One, who throng those bright and rolling worlds…”? Almost certainly not. But I have to take every opportunity possible to make use of that English degree I received in 1932.
Anyway, the footage helped clarify what the darn thing is about. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll know that, at first, it was a prequel to Alien, then it wasn’t any sort of prequel at all. Now, it’s a film set in the same universe at an earlier point to the great 1979 picture. Scott, who joined Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender and Charlize Theron on stage, explained that, ever since the film came out, people have been asking him about the “space jockey“. That, in nerd speak, is the ossified creature that Sigourney Weaver and gang encounter shortly after landing on the planet where the alien lurks. Now, we’ll know the answer.
There was a fair bit of interesting chatter. Fassbender, who plays an android, explained that, while preparing for the role, Scott had pointed him towards the great Joseph Losey picture The Servant. Given that the Harold Pinter-scripted drama is among my favourite films of all time, I couldn’t be any happier. ”I’m a gentleman’s gentleman, and you’re no bloody gentleman!” That’s what Dirk Bogarde says in one of the very rare films where he plays a surly, miserable bstrd.
The closest thing to a controversy kicked off when somebody inquired about the film’s potential certificate. If you have been posting on Prom-Maniac.com you will know that, over a month before the film opens, fans are already getting very het up about this subject. It has been implied that Scott might be prepared to cut the film in order to secure a less lenient cert from the Motion Picture Association of America. This has triggered real anger. Many people out there on the ether regard a stricter cert as a badge of honour. If only adults are allowed in then the film must be for adults. That’s the logic.
Scott was quite interesting on this issue. He admitted that he was a businessman as well as a film-maker and — not wanting to exclude a large portion of the audience — greatly desired a PG-13 rather than a 16 cert. But he sounded pretty annoyed about the way the MPAA went about its business. “I know the importance of that. When a big film fails, it’s disastrous for all of us,” he said. Then he started to get a bit cryptic. He said that he didn’t want to single out a particular movie, because it was directed by a friend of his, but he was surprised at some of the “films this year that have got PG-13 ratings – it’s absolutely f**king ludicrous. So MPAA, get your house in order.” Can he be thinking of The Hunger Games? It’s a hard phrase to parse. If that film is in his mind then he, presumably, is complaining at the MPAA’s inconsistency, rather than getting all angry about the wee kids being exposed to knife fights in The Hunger Games. I’m just guessing here.
Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.