John Elway’s Company Being Sued

January 11, 2012 by staff 

John Elway's Company Being SuedJohn Elway’s Company Being Sued, The flurry of lawsuits being filed by former NFL players is strange. I know some players will have problems with post-career medical issues, but here’s a question that I have to ask: Didn’t they know what they signed up for when they signed that contract? The NFL is a violent game. Period.

Nobody forces players to play. They get compensated to do a job.

Getting hit hard is part of the game. Injuries are part of the game. Concussions are part of the game.

Has the NFL always acted in the players’ best interests when it came to injuries? They probably didn’t. But how much is on the player himself — pushing to stay on the field, fearful of losing a job or a check.

I think the NFL’s decision to make the game safer now is the right thing to do. Why not be more cautious? But I also don’t think that it gives the former players a right to file lawsuits.

For starters: How do we know the concussion issues didn’t start in Pop Warner or on the high-school level or at college. Is every former Pop Warner player going to sue his former association? Can I file suit against my high school or my former coach?

The lawsuits allege the league didn’t do enough to protect the players from concussions. These lawsuits will be played out for the next couple of years as players try to prove that they NFL did them wrong.

What’s next? Will we see firemen suing their company for being burned in a fire? Or a writer filing suit against his employer because his eyes go bad from being on a computer all day?

It’s part of the job. You are compensated to do a job.

Nobody forces NFL players to play. I ask this question: Would any of the players who are parts of those suits trade it all back to not have played the game?

Bet they’d all say no.

I’m all for player safety. And I love the way the NFL has changed the rules to make that possible.

But these lawsuits are over-the-top in my eyes.

Here’s what the NFL should do moving forward: Make players sign liability waivers. If you don’t sign, you don’t play.

Want to bet every player signs?

The rewards are worth the risks. That’s why they put their bodies on the line each and every Sunday.

It’s a nasty game. It’s a violent game. It’s a dangerous game.

But it’s also a game you play voluntarily.

—The past two weeks are why Denver Broncos president John Elway won’t commit to Tim Tebow long term as his starter. Why would he? Elway knows that the NFL is a passing league now more than ever. Tebow can’t pass.

Not in the way you need quarterbacks to pass. That was exposed in a big way against the Bills this week. He threw four interceptions, two were returned for touchdowns, and he looked downright horrible. Tebow can complete the 15-yard slant off the option fake, but when it comes to putting his foot in the ground, reading the field, making the right, accurate throw, he struggles with that.

Tebow holds the ball and he doesn’t appear to have a grasp on reading coverages. What the Broncos have done with him this season is just short of a miracle. If they win Sunday against the Chiefs, they will be in the playoffs. Tebow Nation will rejoice.

But the reality is that it’s nothing more than an aberration season, like Kerry Collins going 13-3 for the Titans or David Garrard going 11-5 for the Jaguars. These happen once in a while. But the success isn’t sustainable. Elway knows this. That’s why he said Tebow would be back last week, but never said he would be his starter. How could he make the commitment now, especially after seeing Tebow floundering against the Bills Sunday?

This isn’t piling on a kid after a bad game, either. It’s how I’ve felt all along since watching his college tapes. Others thought the same, but gave in during his six-game winning streak, but I see too many flaws in his passing to do that.

Report to Team

Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.


Comments are closed.