‘John Carter’ Snowballs Into Massive Loss
March 20, 2012 by staff
‘John Carter’ Snowballs Into Massive Loss, “John Carter” is now an official flop. The Walt Disney Co. on Monday acknowledged in a statement that the movie’s poor performance at the box office likely will force Disney to take a $200 million writedown. The company expects its studio divison will post an operating loss of as much as $120 million in the second fiscal quarter of this year.
“John Carter,” based on an Edgar Rice Burroughs character, was made for about a quarter-billion dollars;marketing costs were another $100 million on top of that. But the movie grossed only $30.2 million domestically during its first weekend of release, taking in a measly $13.5 million its second.
The picture was brighter overseas, grossing around $126 million abroad in the 10 days since its March 9 release.
“In light of the theatrical performance of John Carter ($184 million global box office), we expect the film to generate an operating loss of approximately $200 million during our second fiscal quarter ending March 31,” the company said in a statement. “As a result, our current expectation is that the studio segment will have an operating loss of between $80 and $120 million for the second quarter.”
The writedown means “John Carter” is one of history’s biggest flops. It rates alongside such stinkers as “Mars Needs Moms,” a 2011 movie that cost $150 million to make and grossed $39 million worldwide; “Ishtar,” the 1987 disaster that cost $55 million to make and grossed $14 million domestically and “Heaven’s Gate,” the 3 hour 39 minute 1980 bomb that cost $44 million to make and grossed $3.48 million domestically.
Even before “John Carter” arrived in theaters, Hollywood had labeled it a bomb. Early on, there were wide reports that the sci-fi extravaganza had gone over budget and required many costly reshoots. An uninspired trailer only made the situation worse.
Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.