Jamie Junger

December 7, 2009 by USA Post 

Jamie Junger:Jamie Junger has been identified as Tiger Woods’ fourth mistress: well, at least according to a disgruntled ex-boyfriend of Jamie Junger’s:

Sex-mad Tiger Woods cheated on wife Elin with a fourth ­mistress – Jamie Jungers – the Sunday Mirror can reveal. The predatory golfer had been ­married just nine months when he seduced 26-year-old model Jamie, above, at a Las Vegas party.

Over the next 18 months they met for sex in his California pad surrounded by wedding ­pictures of shameless Woods and his new bride. The revelation comes as sources in Vegas, where Woods lived a parallel life of sex and sleaze in complete contrast to his Mr Clean public image, said the golfer was a sex addict who relentlessly pursued women.

Jamie is the fourth mistress named as having an affair with him, with sources suggesting the disgraced golf icon – who traded on his wholesome image to coin in millions in sponsorship deals every year – may have had flings with at least four ­others.

It is of course huge fun to pile on on a man when he’s down but we’ve not really been getting all that much proof of what has actually been going on. The above story states that Jamie Junger was indede Tiger’s fourth mistress: but we’ve not heard from either her or him. The only person we’ve actually heard from here is her ex-boyfriend. That doesn’t mean the story isn’t true, of course, but that also doesn’t mean that it is true in each and every particular. Or even true at all.

Just to give us all the list again: Rachel Uchitel (so far at least) denies having had an affair. Jamiee Grubbs claims to have had one. Kalika Moquin has said nothing, with Jamie Jungers it is her ex- saying everything, Cori Rist similarly has said nothing and Mindy Lawton is claiming to have had an affair with Tiger. We’ve not really got much proof with any of them.

Report to Team

Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.


Comments are closed.