Cameron And Tyler Winklevoss
June 23, 2011 by Post Team
Cameron And Tyler Winklevoss, Cameron does not have decided to appeal to the Supreme twins rowing your Tyler Winklevoss, upholding his ruling with a decision in the court of $ 65 million and Facebook Inc. founder Mark Zuckerberg, and signaling the possible end of the tediousness of running the contest.
2008 according to the purpose that the purpose of which was the reason, or was over the discord of the world Zuckerberg stole Winklevosses It displays a website, who attended Harvard University with him. And the battle was dramatized in the 2010 film “The Social Network.”
After agreeing as to the genus, and to this end, we ask that Winklevosses waves, is false, saying, because we hid nothing from them that they earned more money.
6 that the foot-5-inch (1.96-meters), twins were in 2008 Beijing Olympics, who competed, whether an appeal is an appeal had been a course of pain was ruling in the trial 11 to the seat of the upholding of San Francisco, that this court “Enough prosperity”.
In that day the court filing Wednesday, Winklevosses that after “careful consideration” it has pleased the Supreme Court not to seek the review. The neither filing nor reason for his decision.
Zuckerberg created Facebook in place of Harvard University dormitory in 2004.
Winklevosses Harvard to set up than in the case have been brought by California, when a student connects Inc. Divya Narendra, who joined me we filing.
Said no, he said: “We are your long deliberated upon here, and it pleased the other party agrees that the prices now.”
Jerome Falk Winklevosses Narendra for the law and not immediately return a comment for prayers.
Place a picture and clears the way to seek the cause of the interposition of dismissal filed related fear in the Boston course.
Analysts estimated to have piles of Alto as the sidebar of life, is more, or 70 billion initial public office if the situation in the first or perhaps 2012.
You must be logged in more than 100 billion IPO, to work with CNBC last week.
Et al et al v. Facebook Inc. is made Connects Inc., 9 U.S. Circuit Court of appeals, and No. 08-16745.
Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.