Bryan Gonzalez Border Patrol For Almost Two Years
March 7, 2012 by staff
Bryan Gonzalez Border Patrol For Almost Two Years, Seems the Border Patrol won’t tolerate any of its employees questioning marijuana prohibition, as one now-unemployed agent discovered at the cost of his job.
Micah McCoy of the ACLU writes:
[T]he American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico (ACLU-NM) filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on behalf of a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agent who was fired because of his personal political opinions. Plaintiff Bryan Gonzalez was an agent with two years of experience and excellent performance reviews when the Border Patrol terminated his employment after learning that Gonzalez held certain political opinions pertaining to drug legalization and immigration.
“Firing a public servant because of their political opinions is an egregious violation of the First Amendment,” said ACLU-NM Executive Director Peter Simonson. “We cannot require nor should we expect uniformity of thought within our law enforcement institutions. Purging the ranks of government employees who fail “ideological purity” tests is about as un-American as it gets.”
Patrolling near Deming, New Mexico in April 2009, Gonzalez pulled his vehicle up next to a fellow CBP agent who was in the same vicinity. In the course of a casual discussion concerning the drug-related violence in Mexico, Gonzales remarked that he believed that legalization of drugs would be the most effective way to end the violence. He also related to the other agent that, as a former dual U.S.-Mexican citizen, he understood the economic factors that drive migrants to cross the border without documentation to seek work.
Word of Gonzalez’s opinions on these matters quickly spread to his supervisor, who informed the Joint Intake Command in Washington, D.C. Internal Affairs launched an investigation soon after, and the Border Patrol terminated Gonzalez in October 2009, just weeks before his probationary period expired. The termination letter stated that Gonzalez held “personal views that were contrary to the core characteristics of Border Patrol Agents, which are patriotism, dedication, and esprit de corps.”
“I was terminated not because my service was inadequate, but
because I hold certain opinions that are shared by millions of my fellow Americans,” said Gonzalez. “I am no less patriotic or dedicated to excellence in my work because I respectfully disagree with some of our current border enforcement policies. It was wrong for the U.S. Border Patrol to retaliate against me for exercising my free speech rights guaranteed by the very Constitution I swore to uphold.”
ACLU-NM seeks a declaration by the court that the Border Patrol violated Bryan Gonzalez’s First Amendment right to free speech, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.
ACLU-NM Cooperating Attorney George Bach and ACLU-NM Co-legal Directors Julie Sakura and Reber Boult represent the plaintiff in this case.
The complaint is available online here .
And from Daniel Tencer at Raw Story comes this added fillip:
In an exclusive interview, Gonzalez told Raw Story he was questioned by Customs and Border Patrol’s Office of Internal Affairs – a confrontation that felt more to him like an “interrogation.”
“I was asked if I wanted to overthrow the American government,” he said. “I was asked if I was a socialist.”
But his only transgression was to say that legalizing marijuana would “eliminate a lot of unnecessary deaths.”
Ah, that dreaded S-word, socialism.
So socialism is now grounds for dismissal from government service, that most socialized of all occupational venues?
It’s not patriotic to be a socialist? Then Border Patrol members better stop saying the Pledge of Allegiance, since that little nostrum was authored by [shudder] a socialist! Except for the “under God” words, which were added during the Eisenhower years when the nation was busily engaged in fighting “godless communism.”
We can still remember struggling with the daily morning classroom recitation when the words were added back in Nineteen-ought-fifty-four. The new phrase broke a familiar rhythm and didn’t come easily to the tongue.
It’s no struggle for us now. We have spoken the words of the pledge since 1966, when we stopped in protest of the Vietnam War.
Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.