12 Result PSEB Mohali

May 31, 2010 by Post Team 

12 Result PSEB Mohali:MEETINGS OF CLASS VIII: line result does not match school results wise computer brands have not been added

The result of Class VIII declared by the Punjab School Education Board (PSEB) on May 15 has caused confusion among students and schools. This is the first time that the PSEB had released the results on the Internet, but students were surprised to discover that the online results did not match the result received by the schools.

Shashi Sharma, director of Everest Model Senior Secondary School Moti Nagar, said: “Today’s students came to me with the result of internet and was surprised to see that was different from what we received in the Internet rational school results . Afteranlyzing more than three hours, we realized that the computer marks were not added to the school results wise. However, the individual results on the Internet, computer brands are shown to have been added .

Rajinder Sharma, President of the Association of PSEB Affiliated Schools in Punjab, said: “We have written a letter to the PSEB authorities and requested him to instruct the authorities concerned to do what is necessary.”

Meanwhile, Dalbir Singh Dhillon, chairman, PSEB, Mohali, said: “We have added brands of Computer Science, but if by chance you have not been added in the outcome of school-wise, is not a big problem. Schools can do this on their own. ”

Everest Public School shines
Students of Everest Public Senior Secondary School, Moti Nagar, showed a 100 percent on the results of standard tests Punjab Middle School Education Board. Anjali, with 826 of 900 marks is 52nd position in the merit list of Punjab and 16 in Ludhiana. Vinita guaranteed Gogna 792, Neha scored 786, 784 and got Gurpreet Kaur Akriti scored 777. As many as 12 students scored over 80 percent and 69 got first division.

Report to Team

Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.


Comments are closed.